主要观点总结
近期，湖北武汉一家法院支持了一位网民针对其人工智能创作的艺术作品未经许可被用于广告而提起的诉讼。原告王某使用AI创作了一张图片并在社交媒体平台小红书上发布，后来发现在一家科技公司的抖音广告中使用了该图片。法院认定该图片属于艺术品，受到版权法保护，并认定王某为该图片的作者和版权所有者，有权提起诉讼。该公司因此被要求向王某赔偿经济损失和合理费用共计4000元人民币。
关键观点总结
关键观点1: AI创作的艺术作品版权问题
文章主要讨论了AI创作的艺术作品的版权问题，以及在未经许可的情况下使用该作品可能引发的法律纠纷。
关键观点2: 王某的创作过程和版权归属
王某的创作过程包括构思、输入关键词和调整参数等，法院认定王某在创作过程中行使了“控制和预见”的能力，因此该图片体现了王某的个性化表达，应受版权保护。
关键观点3: 科技公司对王某图片的使用和侵权行为
科技公司未经许可使用王某的图片进行在线推广，侵犯了王某的版权和发布权，因此被法院判决赔偿王某的经济损失和合理费用。
关键观点4: 法院的判决和结果
法院认定王某是该图片的合法版权所有者，有权提起诉讼。判决科技公司赔偿王某4000元人民币，并且判决具有法律约束力。
文章预览
A court in Wuhan, Hubei province, recently ruled in favor of a netizen whose AI-generated art was used in an advertisement without permission. The plaintiff, surnamed Wang, created an image using AI and released it on the social media platform Xiaohongshu on May 17 last year. The post received 35,000 likes and about 660 comments. On June 20, Wang noticed her image in an advertisement from a tech company about AI painting training courses on Douyin. She claimed that although the image was generated by AI, she conceived the idea, inputted the keywords and made adjustments during its production. According to her, even if multiple sources coincidentally input matching keywords, the images generated would be unique. She also said she registered the image's copyright on May 26. The people's court of the Donghu High-Tech Development Zone in Wuhan held that the image generated by Wang is no different from photos or paintings commonly seen by people. It clearly belongs to the realm of art, poss
………………………………
