文章预览
关注这里 每天进步一点点 收获成长和自信 MOUNTAINAS 翻译 | hua外音，若水 小编 | 澜意 Scrutinising science The watchers on the Web 网络监督员 A court case may define the limits of anonymous scientific criticism 一个法院的案件可能会定义匿名科学评论的界限 Nov 5th 2016 | From the print edition 2016.11.5 |印刷版 MANY scientific studies are flawed. Often, the reason is poor methodology. Sometimes, it is outright fraud . The conventional means of correction—a letter to the journal concerned—can take months. But there is now an alternative. PubPeer is a website that lets people comment anonymously on research papers and so, in theory, helps purge the scientific literature of erroneous findings more speedily. 许多科学研究都是有缺陷的，这一原因大多是由于缺乏方法论造成的。但有时，
………………………………
